Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Call Me Francis Tucket

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Evidence has been provided that there are at least enough independent reliable sources covering first nominated article, and probably all of the series. RL0919 (talk) 06:28, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Call Me Francis Tucket

Call Me Francis Tucket (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Tucket's Ride (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Tucket's Gold (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Tucket's Home (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nominating entire series. No reviews, no coverage. Fail GNG and NBOOK. ‡ El cid, el campeador talk 17:33, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. ‡ El cid, el campeador talk 17:33, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. ‡ El cid, el campeador talk 17:33, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Gary Paulsen. Fails GNG and NBOOK but as works by a notable author they are reasonable search terms and should redirect to his page. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 18:23, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
As reviews have been shown to exist to satisfy
WP:NBOOK, changing to keep Qwaiiplayer (talk) 13:42, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply
]
  • Redirect to Gary Paulsen per reason above. Justiyaya 19:00, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - I guess I should have included this in my nom, but I support redirecting. Just wanted a community consensus that no pages are warranted, or I would have just redirected myself. Cheers ‡ El cid, el campeador talk 20:03, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment, just a suggestion for editors looking at the notability or otherwise of children/young adult books, don't just have a look at google, check the catalogues of library systems that have plenty of those books ie. with
    reviews its a keep from me for TG. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:27, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Keep, meet
    Mr. Tucket (presently a redirect to the author) has 3 reviews (Publishers Weekly, Booklist, and The Horn Book Magazine (here) so is also entitled to an article. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:25, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Keep, per Coolabahapple's digging. Ifnord (talk) 23:41, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.