Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cameron Ashplant
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on
"soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 05:44, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
]
Cameron Ashplant
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Cameron Ashplant (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Refbombed spam for non
notable film maker. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. No notable productions. No major awards. Refbombed with primary sources, routine announcements, reproduced PR, student publications and local interest puff. Constructed by three now blocked tagteaming SPAs and a bunch of Guernsey IPs. duffbeerforme (talk) 04:42, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and United Kingdom. AllyD (talk) 07:44, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 04:44, 9 March 2023 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 06:52, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Beyond WP:GNG (which we fail - the Durham Student Newspaper and other sources presented here not being RS and there being virtually nothing more out there in the great wide world), WP:NACTOR directs us to: "Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions or has made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment." We do neither of these two things. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 08:51, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.