Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Capsule (film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sam Walton (talk) 00:16, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Capsule (film)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I had some difficulty weeding through the Google results for something with this generic a name, but I didn't find anything to make me believe it passes GNG. Seems to be a very small-time film with no reviews in major publications. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 23:07, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the

talk • mail) 00:18, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete as it fails
WP:NFILM at this time. It looks like it is a early film for the makers and is making the circuit of small film festivals. If it ever achieves significant coverage than it can be recreated. I also tried to find an article that it might be redirected to but came up empty. MarnetteD|Talk 00:37, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete, the film is too obscure and non-notable. Fred Dobbs 2017 (talk) 20:30, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails
WP:NFILM. -- Dane ^talk 02:24, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.