Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CarSim

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 04:02, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CarSim

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged for notability since 2010. No indication if the sources have

WP:GNG. First two sources seem to have been written by the article's initial author. UtherSRG (talk) 17:53, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology, Computing, and Transportation. UtherSRG (talk) 17:53, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment -Sorry haven't done AfD for yonks, can't remember the etiquette. Anyway, Carsim is used intensively in one small field, vehicle dynamics simulation. It is not the market leader, but it has been around forever. There's virtually no google coverage of it other than press releases so I suppose its notability is questionable. Greglocock (talk) 05:09, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that would mean that the field is too small to be of interest for a wide audience. gidonb (talk) 16:22, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:30, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per comments above. gidonb (talk) 16:22, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.