Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cardiology (album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 19:09, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cardiology (album)

Hammer time Descíclope (talk) 08:38, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Album has a title, Hammer doesn't stand. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 12:54, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It applies because of {{Citation needed}}. No source has confirmed the name of the album yet. Descíclope (talk) 16:30, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. —Descíclope (talk) 16:34, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Band is notable, but without a valid source (and that single link isn't) this is just
WP:CRYSTAL at best. Delete so it can be created when and if the album is announced. §FreeRangeFrog 18:56, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete While this is likely to be a notable album, without a source, it fails
WP:Crystal Mrathel (talk) 19:04, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete, no
WP:CRYSTAL. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 02:03, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete, as per previous reasons, WP:MUSIC, WP:CRYSTAL. Article has no confirmed material and there doesn't appear to be any RS covering the album apart from an interview with Kerrang! k-i-a-c (hitmeup - the past) 05:26, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - [1] would seem to confirm the album title at least. Grandmartin11 (talk) 17:37, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.