Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carlena Britch

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 08:23, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Carlena Britch

Carlena Britch (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Advertorially toned

user-generated video sharing or social networking sites verify that she exists. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 21:45, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 11:30, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, as Bearcat said, absolutely no coverage at all, linking to youtube videos does not count as adequate sourcing. ThePlatypusofDoom (Talk) 12:01, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, completely non-notable. I notic ethat the article is tagged for cleanup; a cleanuop of this guff which can only have been written by a particularly dumb pr drone, would leave nothing.TheLongTone (talk) 14:26, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the
talk) 18:30, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply
]
Note: This debate has been included in the
talk) 18:30, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply
]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.