Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carol Smallwood (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. It's

]

Carol Smallwood

Carol Smallwood (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Orangemike created a nomination page, but somehow it was broken, so I decided to delete it and create it anew. His original rationale was as follows:

Non-notable poet; winner of a handful of obscure awards we don't have articles about, some of which I can't even figure out who awards them (the "coveted Silver Sow Award" syndrome).

I'm neutral. Nyttend (talk) 02:49, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep' - Was considered notable last time around (
  b} 10:18, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep Its obvious she passes the
  WP:NAUTHOR
  ) notability criteria.

To @Orangmike: The article says: "She won the National Federation of State Poetry Societies Award.[1] Smallwood also was awarded the Franklin-Christoph Poetry Contest Winner title, and the Eric Hoffer Award for Prose" um... the awarding bodies are in the titles? This is incredibly obvious, I can't believe you can't figure that out. Dysklyver 14:06, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orangemike, see above comment, which meant to ping you but failed because of a typo. Nyttend (talk) 00:01, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep This seems rather a suitable article to me about someone whose achievements are well worthy of consideration. In terms of reviews of her work
  WP:AUTHOR seems to have been met so I won't worry my little head about awards. Thincat (talk) 14:49, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Note: This debate has been included in the

Lepricavark (talk) 17:41, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the

Lepricavark (talk) 17:41, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the

Lepricavark (talk) 17:41, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

• Keep Passes NAUTHOR. Plenty of critical reception for her work. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:49, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Seems to pass
  WP:NAUTHOR notability since she has well-known work. Mvocab (talk) 23:40, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep Same reason as the past AfD. She meets notability, easy as that. SEMMENDINGER (talk) 00:19, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Look at the substance. The reviews are obscure and often by people she works with, the awards even more so. I honestly don't see the notability. --Orange Mike | Talk 01:53, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.