Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cartoon Network (EMEA)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Cartoon Network. Davewild (talk) 19:34, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cartoon Network (EMEA)

)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication that the EMEA version of Cartoon Network is notable as a separate entity from Cartoon Network itself, no sources, and no verifiable information. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 18:55, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the

talk!) 19:37, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Merge or Redirect to
talk) 23:00, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete - not enough independent coverage to support separate article
YO 😜 23:15, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Comment If this is closed as "delete", the closing admin will have to note a bunch of redirects to this page. Nyttend (talk) 00:32, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This article, like a large number of international Cartoon Network articles, has been subject to extensive vandalism and nonsensical page moves, deletions, redirects and re-creations. It really is a rat's nest of destruction. It's not possible to give a fair assessment of the notability of the subject based on the article while it remains in its intentionally damaged state.
Bonusballs (talk) 09:47, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Merge Once upon a time there was a
Cartoon Network (Middle East & Africa) article as I'm pretty certain it was unsourced and had probably never been sourced or had always been grossly undersourced. The PROD went unchallenged. I couldn't find significant content written about the concept of Cartoon Network (Middle East & Africa) outside of passing mentions. Unless the division is producing unique content, which I've no reason to believe based on zero references, I don't know how it's notable enough to maintain its own article. Seems you could easily incorporate a beefy paragraph of sourced prose into a general "Cartoon Network (International) article and that'd be good enough. Anyhow, whatever content can be salvaged should be merged. To where, I don't know yet. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:05, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Merge - I like CN as much as anybody, but no reason to have a separate article with this amount of content. The programming and lineup could easily be moved to a worldwide unified list article by country or region to end the bickering over the main article. --
(Talk) ☮ღ☺ 19:08, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.