Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caterham Grand Prix results

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Table has already been re-merged to article from which it was taken, so there are no attribution problems created by deletion. Deor (talk) 12:05, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Caterham Grand Prix results

Caterham Grand Prix results (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An article that has unnecessarily been spun out of a parent article,

Williams do have separate articles for their results, but they have been in the sport for decades. Caterham have been in the sport for three. A current discussion at the Formula 1 WikiProject suggests that a team should compete for at least ten years before a separate article for results is created. This article should be deleted, and its content restored to its original location. Prisonermonkeys (talk) 22:34, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:49, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:49, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • What you're proposing is a merge. There's no need to discuss this at AfD. Pburka (talk) 02:35, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge or delete - It's already here, and has been for a week, might as well do something with it. Merge seems the obvious choice. Dennis - 22:46, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge or Delete - noting that the content has already been merged back into the parent article (Caterham F1), so outcomes of "merge" and "delete" are effectively synonymous. DH85868993 (talk) 23:38, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.