Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Catherine Fleming Bruce

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 06:53, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Catherine Fleming Bruce

Catherine Fleming Bruce (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a writer and political candidate, not

run of the mill campaign coverage that every candidate in any election can always show, which does not establish a reason why her candidacy would be of more enduring significance than everybody else's candidacies. Bearcat (talk) 13:14, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Thank you for these notes - did manage to find additional sources, which I was unable to do for some of the other former candidate pages I created! The sources suggest that the book received significant critical attention. ProfessorKaiFlai (talk) 06:56, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 14:28, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment She lost her election, so she's an activist as far as AfD is concerned. Nothing notable about her career. Still a !delete. Oaktree b (talk) 15:20, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Keep - an unelected politician is still a politician per
    WP:SUSTAINED coverage of various aspects of her political, preservationist, and activist career, as well as some biographical information that when combined, support her notability and can further develop the article. Beccaynr (talk) 20:47, 22 November 2022 (UTC) - update !vote to remove 'weak' per additions by Bridget - Beccaynr (talk) 22:52, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Keep - I just added 3 articles from
    Newspapers.com. Bridget (talk) 20:52, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply
    ]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to assess changes to the article since the AFD nomination.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 17:28, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I see reliable sources publishing about her and the argument to keep is well articulated above. CT55555(talk) 15:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Beccaynr and Bridget. Passes
    WP:GNG. Sal2100 (talk) 22:00, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ). No further edits should be made to this page.