Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caucasian Sketches
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep. – Robert 03:48, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Caucasian Sketches
I think it's too NN, and no one really knows what they're talking about in the article. -- King of Hearts 23:41, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as WP:Complete Bollocks. Eddie.willers 23:52, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - The topic is not bollocks and as most definitely IS notable enough to support an article. That said, aside from non-NPOV praise, there's not much there now. There is much better coverage in the paragraph about the sketches in Mikhail Ippolitov-Ivanov. I don't oppose deletion just because the page adds nothing to the bigger article, but I'd rather tag it NPOV and leave it as a stub to encourage development ×Meegs 00:02, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep exceedingly famous composition, indeed the most famous piece by Ippolitov-Ivanov. You'd recognize it if you heard it. Desperately needs cleanup. I'd do it now but I'm at work; I'll try to get to it later. Antandrus (talk) 00:31, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and cleanup. Calsicol 01:10, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and cleanup. Wish they came up with a better translation from Russian for the piece. Caucasus Scetches or something. Flyboy Will 01:26, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and wait more than a minute before tagging something for afd next time :( - Bobet 01:42, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- keep-- I buffed it without adding or subtracting any facts. It is now a respectable stub or short article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alteripse (talk • contribs) 15:00, 2005 December 20 (UTC)
- Keep, it has improved greatly ×Meegs 18:28, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep --Ghirlandajo 07:40, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep per Alteripse. Stifle 00:29, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.