Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Center for Advanced Public Safety

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ad Orientem (talk) 13:56, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Center for Advanced Public Safety

Center for Advanced Public Safety (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

None of the sources are actually about the subject, they mention it primarily in the context of author affiliation. The entire thing is drawn from primary sources. Guy (Help!) 22:50, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:03, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:03, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Alabama-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:03, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - A quick Google news search shows that there is some coverage available; the article just needs some work to add in third-party sources and to remove some of the info added by an account with apparent COI. Jmertel23 (talk) 23:51, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep As Jmertel said, there is enough coverage here for a article on this. There is conflict of interest editing in the page and the sources are third-party, but this doesn't mean that the article shouldn't be kept and expanded on later. Twinky995 (talk) 23:58, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - per
    WP:N..Monterey Bay (talk) 00:07, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Keep Lots of Ghits - looks like adequate RS. Deathlibrarian (talk) 01:59, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.