Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chad Johnson (physicist)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 05:36, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Chad Johnson (physicist)

Chad Johnson (physicist) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

So this was PRODed, and I dePRODed it, and then after reflecting on it, eh I probably should have left it PRODed. Because of that, I'll take ownership of my trigger-finger and start an AfD for it. This individual seems to be a non-noteworthy individual whom fails

as well. I did some searching and couldn't find anything notable, though that is kinda of difficult as it's a somewhat common name. I gave google scholar a look just to be safe as well and that is entirely unnoteworthy as well.

Basically, it's a vanity page (and he is pretty, I'll give him that).

Thanks! --Tautomers_{(T C)} 05:53, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Definitely a vanity page. It's unfortunately difficult to search for publications at Web of Science because there are lots of people called C. J. Johnson, and plenty called Chad Johnson. However, I've found nothing to suggest a notable researcher. Two papers listed on his page are typical particle-physics papers with huge numbers of authors and nothing to indicate who did what. Athel cb (talk) 07:07, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:48, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:48, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:51, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:51, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per Athel cb. Sungodtemple (talk) 12:37, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above.
  b} 14:30, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete. I dearly hoped
  Chad Johnson from The Bachelorette had branched out from poetic villain to physicist... which would be the only way this guy would be notable, as he certainly doesn't meet NPROF. JoelleJay (talk) 19:10, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete. Review of the article confirms what has already been said. —Quondum 21:35, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.