Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chadwicks Shrink Sleeves

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. plicit 02:04, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Chadwicks Shrink Sleeves

Chadwicks Shrink Sleeves (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company. No significant coverage. Orphaned for a decade. PepperBeast (talk) 01:33, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and United Kingdom. Shellwood (talk) 09:44, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I was considering putting this up for AfD myself when I couldn’t find any appropriate merge or redirect targets. Mccapra (talk) 14:03, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, partly because the current article is almost entirely a COPYVIO from the timeline on the company's website. Despite its own claim to a long heritage, it seems to have changed its name more than once (it's now called "Chadwicks Lids") and I'm not convinced a packaging company would have hit the general news headlines sufficietly to pass
    WP:NCORP. Time for it to be wrapped up. Sionk (talk) 22:18, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ). No further edits should be made to this page.