Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chalilakath Kunhahammed Haji
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Chalilakath Kunahmed Haji. (merge/redirect) Courcelles 01:08, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Chalilakath Kunhahammed Haji
This article is an unsourced mess. It fails Wikipedia:Notability (people) in more ways than one, and almost reads like a fan page - the subject's official website is the only given source. MezzoMezzo (talk) 04:01, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. MezzoMezzo (talk) 04:04, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. MezzoMezzo (talk) 04:05, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. MezzoMezzo (talk) 04:06, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No secondary sources. Xxanthippe (talk) 04:08, 5 March 2013 (UTC).[reply]
- Addition: Chalilakath Kunahmed Haji seems to be the same person; they both have the same birth and death date and the similarly unpronouncable name. Also, like this article, the one to which I just linked is also lacking in any reliable sources and appears to be advertising. Can we just list both articles here, or should I go through the process of nominating that one for AfD separately? MezzoMezzo (talk) 05:40, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Well spotted. I would have though we could agree to address them both here provided an AfD notice is put on the latter article. Xxanthippe (talk) 06:03, 5 March 2013 (UTC).[reply]
- Speedy blank and redirect to Chalilakath Kunahmed Haji, duplicate content. 3 sources in original article. In ictu oculi (talk) 06:45, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.