Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chapman, California

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Corte Madera, California. Vanamonde (Talk) 04:55, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Chapman, California

Chapman, California (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats
)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not recognized in Durham. No indication of notability. Appears to be a neighborhood of Corte Madera. Glendoremus (talk) 21:47, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:51, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:51, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Corte Madera, California: WP:GEOLAND "informal regions of a state, unofficial neighborhoods, etc. – any of which could be considered notable on a case-by-case basis, given non-trivial coverage in multiple, independent reliable sources.", there is nothing that meets non-trivial coverage in multiple, independent reliable sources. If someone feels it merit mention, the sentence could be copied into target.   // Timothy :: talk  01:48, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete So whoever was doing GNIS entries in this area found another way to make up spurious places, because, yes, this is also one from a nautical chart, a very large scale one showing an area from Point Sur to well north of SF. A smaller scale map of the same area show no such place name, and of course it's not there on any topo. I have no idea where the charts people got their place names, but in any case the chart that this came from is so large scale that there's barely room for the placenames, so assigning this to any specific feature of any kind is pretty futile. Unless there is some testimony for it outside GNIS/NOAA, there's no reason to credit its existence. Mangoe (talk) 19:07, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.