Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charlie Alejandro

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe decker^{talk to me} 15:31, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Charlie Alejandro (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject of this article has not had any significant film roles and appears to fail the notability criteria at

Note: This debate has been included in the

bot!) 04:04, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

• Delete per lack of notable sources that could help a biography, as I didn't find any notable sources on Google and Yahoo. SwisterTwister talk 06:40, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Note There is no AfD notice on this article.  Nipsonanomhmata  ^(Talk) 18:46, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It was removed about two hours ago by the article author; I just replaced it. VQuakr (talk) 18:52, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. You really couldn't just A7 this? Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 22:07, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I interpreted the claim in the article of being extra in a few films as a claim of significance. A7 is pretty narrow. VQuakr (talk) 01:22, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Agree that being an uncredited actor in films is not notable. Bgwhite (talk) 06:28, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.