Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charlie Cook (wrestler)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nakon 01:37, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Charlie Cook (wrestler)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence that this is a notable wrestler. Neither source seems like a reliable source on the matter. I believe this is the same wrestler as deleted in 2007 per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charlie Cook. Ricky81682 (talk) 07:37, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

~~Probable Weak~~ Keep: ...but this would need specialist attention/rescue, since given the era sourcing would mostly need to be from wrestling magazines. I was thinking that he might have gotten in under

User:MadMax from the previous AFD, he was rated in the top 500 (alltime) in in the 2003 PWI Years list -- (again, on the presumption that that link is correct) I note that they've placed him only 10 below Mikey Whipwreck, and above Mark Henry. He also placed for their 1981 list of Most Improved Wrestler of the Year -- note the company he's in on that list, and that this was not an editorial award, but a reader award! ^~~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~~ 12:33, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Lakun.patra (talk) 12:44, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Lakun.patra (talk) 12:44, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Lakun.patra (talk) 12:45, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Notable wrestler who won several prominent championships. PWI Most Improved Wrestler of the Year in 1981. Sources have been added to help establish notability. GaryColemanFan (talk) 17:12, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the sourcing -- Wikipedia as an antidote to the memory hole of an ephemeral Internet!^~~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~~ 07:04, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the

talk) 22:14, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Keep Won numerous prominent awards in his profession, meets GNG.LM2000 (talk) 23:14, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a notability standard for professional wrestling? It seems to fall to

WP:ENTERTAINER. I'd guess these awards fall under significant roles in stage performances. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 23:58, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

In the past we have used

WP:ATH.LM2000 (talk) 00:16, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

That's explicitly at Wikipedia:Notability_(sports)#Applicable_policies_and_guidelines. I'm just curious how the awards play into that interpretation; I may just withdraw the nomination if it makes sense. The awards are kayfabe in the technical sense but I presume they give an impression of the significance of his role within the industry or at least within the league. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 05:48, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Cook's article mentions that he won the Most Improved Wrestler of the Year award in 1981, but List of Pro Wrestling Illustrated awards and Cagematch state he was the third runner up. Does anyone have access to the reference in Cook's article that can do a quick fact check? Nikki♥311 18:38, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Response - Sorry about that. I'm not sure what I was thinking when I added that. I have corrected it. GaryColemanFan (talk) 07:04, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.