Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cheetahmen
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirected to ]
Cheetahmen
- )
Contested prod. Non-notable group of fictional characters. Topic fails
verifiability requirements for lacking any reliable secondary sources, possibly unverifiable. Chardish 19:35, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]
- Mascots based on a non-notable video game? Delete as non-notable, unless someone comes up with some impressive reliable sources before the AFD ends. Tony Fox (arf!) 20:20, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. It's notable/notorious in the sense of being dubbed one of the worst, if not the worst, most poorly coded games of all time by several video game reviewers, though none of them are treated like authorities. The information presented is fairly accurate but is unsourced, as most of the info was added before Wiki's standards tightened up. I'd rather see it given more of a stub status and the opportunity to receive citations or possibly merged with the Active Enterprises article, as this was one of the company's few developed properties. - Liontamer 15:55, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- REVOTE from Keep; Merge with ]
- Keep. It's notable/notorious in the sense of being dubbed one of the worst, if not the worst, most poorly coded games of all time by several video game reviewers, though none of them are treated like authorities. The information presented is fairly accurate but is unsourced, as most of the info was added before Wiki's standards tightened up. I'd rather see it given more of a stub status and the opportunity to receive citations or possibly merged with the
- KEEP. It looks like there's a lot more information on the Japanese version of the page. Xylthixlm 05:54, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.