Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chennaiyil Oru Mazhaikalam
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. –Juliancolton | Talk 03:09, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Chennaiyil Oru Mazhaikalam
- Chennaiyil Oru Mazhaikalam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Apparently fails
future films notability guidelines. No prejudice towards recreation when reliable sources indicate that filming has already begun. Reference claiming that filming had already begun in July 2007 is demonstrably false (it refers to a promotional stills shoot, not actual motion picture filming), and sources as late as March 2008 still refer to this as "to be shooting shortly". No evidence within the past year that this has progressed any further than pre-production. Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 20:31, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply
]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —Salih (talk) 11:15, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —Salih (talk) 11:19, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 00:08, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom or move to name space. Clearcut. Drawn Some (talk) 03:47, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keeep per [1] and [2]. And as per everything from here: [3]. Universal Hero (talk) 10:37, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,Talk 00:00, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep. The two sources linked by Universal Hero are of little use as they only mention the film in passing, but the google news search is more helpful. According to this article, the film "went to floors" (whatever that means) although shooting was put on hold; this article states that filming resumed, while Trisha Krishnan is asked about acting in the film in this interview. It's not much, and those sources are themselves about a year old, but I'm prepared to give it the benefit of the doubt. PC78 (talk) 15:52, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.