Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chicken noodle KD

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, the article is clearly

Chicken noodle KD

Chicken noodle KD (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Recipe - violates

• Delete It's Wikipedia, not Recipedia. Mostly how-to with a teaspoon of hype, but no encyclopedic merit. Jim Ward ^{(talk·stalk)} 23:42, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, possible A7 speedy
  Wikipedia is not the place for things that you make up in your spare time. Simply put, a recipe that somebody made up themselves, clearly stated by the author "...that I came up with during the darker times of my life". Arguably an A7 speedy. KnCv² 23:51, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete per above.--
  Sky Attacker 02:00, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete
  talk) 02:32, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Speedy A7 agree with above. F (talk) 04:31, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per
  WP: MADEUP. Eauhomme (talk) 05:46, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete: Per
  WP:MADEUP. South Bay (talk) 06:47, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete. What more can I say that hasn't already been said? Artichoke-Boy (talk) 19:53, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete & SNOW this, we aren't an unsourced how-to guide. American Eagle (talk) 04:56, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.