Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chilled

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Further discussions concerning merging may take place on the article's talk page. (

talk) 02:11, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Chilled

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

nothing notable at all in article, not even an article, jsut a six song track listing. Alan - talk 05:06, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep — Album of an artist with apparent notability, could use expansion. ContinueWithCaution (talk) 05:14, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

just because the artist has notability doesn't mean the album does.

WP:NALBUMS Alan - talk 06:00, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. —J04n(talk page) 12:33, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or Merge to the discography article. The artist is notable, all information is easily verified.--Michig (talk) 15:55, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm more inclined to keep this as a separate article simply because it would be a better way of organizing the information than trying to fit this into the discography article.--Michig (talk) 07:50, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge — The artist has apparent notability; this should be merged into Chicane discography. Tpk5010 (talk) 17:03, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep (don't merge). Artist is notable, and convention is to therefore keep album. Among other things, we would lose track listing in a merge, as if convention is to not include it (as is the case with merges into band/singer articles), and in any event including the track listing would be inconsistent w/the current format at the discog article.--Epeefleche (talk) 01:27, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.