Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chinbatyn Anun

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Miss World 2008#Contestants. Bishonen | talk 21:11, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Chinbatyn Anun

Chinbatyn Anun (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats
)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable (((The Quixotic Potato))) (talk) 16:04, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the
talk) 16:40, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply
]
Note: This debate has been included in the
talk) 16:40, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply
]
Note: This debate has been included in the
talk) 16:40, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply
]
??? One trivial mention in a nonreliable source doesn't make a BLP subject notable, see WP:GNG. You seem to be misusing wiki-jargon. Do you know what a content dispute is? (((The Quixotic Potato))) (talk) 14:00, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The nomination above is an argument from WP:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions#Just notable/Just not notable.  It does not explain the reasoning of the "why" of why this topic is non-notable.  There is more, though, to a nomination than avoiding arguments to avoid.

Editors who post here are directed that "discussion guidelines are available".  The first point in "Before nominating an article for deletion" is A1, which reads in Permlink 760610382:

== Nominating article(s) for deletion ==

=== Before nominating: checks and alternatives ===

Prior to nominating article(s) for deletion, please be sure to:

A. Read and understand these policies and guidelines

1. The

various deletion processes

Note that WP:BEFORE A1 contains four explicit links within WP:Deletion policy.  Please review WP:BEFORE A1.  Unscintillating (talk) 15:57, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Did you answer my question? (((The Quixotic Potato))) (talk) 16:29, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I've responded to that question, see [1]Unscintillating (talk) 17:32, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as the only claims of significance here are for a mere participation, our simplest standards of these subjects themselves state we must need independent significance; since that's the concern and there's nothing to improve, that supports a nomination. SwisterTwister talk 06:44, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Miss World 2008 § Contestants, where the subject is mentioned. Valid search term. North America1000 02:20, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. This is a person who represented her nation at the highest level of competition in her field. It is reasonable to presume that there are reliable sources beyond those that already appear in the article, even if those additional sources have not yet been found. NewYorkActuary (talk) 19:09, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  B E C K Y S A Y L E 06:42, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 21:08, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.