Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chop Me Up

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to FutureSex/LoveSounds. MBisanz ^talk 10:05, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chop Me Up

)

Completely unsourced, no chart positions, no music video, no commentary. — Realist² 14:49, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Still a notable song. Reliable resources can still be found. Does not fail

WP:MUSIC. ṜέđṃάяķvюĨїήīṣŢ ^{Drop me a line} 15:07, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

How is it notable? There are no sources given to prove that, very week argument. — Realist² 15:23, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. If you are going to claim it is notable, you have to back it up. - Mgm|^(talk) 18:53, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No chart history, no sources. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 17:10, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete--there's no notability, and I can't find anything but downloads and lyrics. Drmies (talk) 17:12, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect (and merge if needed). There is not enough information to warrant a separate article. - Mgm|^(talk) 18:53, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 22:31, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 16:46, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.