Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Conley

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 02:26, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Conley

Chris Conley (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Non-notable band member. This article has been largely created by a horde of sockpuppets and seems to fail

• weak keep putting aside the shortcomings of the article's creator
  Bug Sessions Volume One, Sound the Alarm, Under the Boards) are notable. Pete.Hurd 20:09, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep A small, but very determined, group of editors insists on blanking this page into a redirect to
  WP:3RR violation, with the strong suggestion made that the article should be discussed at Talk:Chris Conley. Apparently, there is no interest in observing Wikipedia policy or following through on suggestions for discussion. In the mean time, there has been no valid argument that this article does not satisfy Wikipedia:Notability criteria. Alansohn 00:12, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep: notable. Colonel Warden 06:14, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy keep This guy easily meets
  WP:MUSIC. Lugnuts 07:49, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep Aye, quite notable, well sourced. Chubbles 08:49, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy keep Lots of good sources, notable band.
  radio me!) 15:43, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep as separate article rather than merge into Saves the Day, since much of the media coverage, such as the Rolling Stone article, does focus on Conley himself. --Paul Erik 18:41, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep or merge to Saves the Day. Well-referenced. --Sc straker 22:41, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Easily passes
  WP:MUSIC. To much talk of trolling, and sockpuppetry which has nothing to do with an articles quality or a subjects notability. I suspect this AfD is just trolling by Jack Merridew looking from a response from User:R:128.40.76.3 who I have nothing to do with and really do not understand what his allegations and complaints are all about. Punkguy182 18:29, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Merge and Redirect per nom. This page has become a magnet - inexplicably - for COI and SPA edits. I aver that the singer is not really independently notable of his band, which is fairly clear from my old pal Alan's link to googlenews in his bureaucratic note. Given the garbage and junk that this article accumulates, along with the questionable notability of the singer, a redirect to Saves the Day is the best solution. Eusebeus 13:44, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Aver all you want, dear old buddy, but consensus here is clear that the content of the article and the more than hundred additional sources available via Google News demonstrate that Conley meets any and all standards of notability based on
    WP:3RR violation, will not be disregarded after this AfD closes as a keep. Alansohn 02:06, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
    ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.