Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chrissy Gephardt (2nd nomination)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. RL0919 (talk) 23:19, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
Chrissy Gephardt
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Chrissy Gephardt (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Seems like a case of
]- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 23:15, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 23:15, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 23:15, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:SECONDARY coverage, 2003), (Orlando Sentinel, 2003, same), (UPI, 2004), (The Advocate, 2004), (Los Angeles Times, 2004) (SFGate, 2007). Beccaynr (talk) 01:43, 3 August 2021 (UTC)]
- Keep This isn't a case of inherited coverage. She's covered because she was outed as a lesbian and then used that fact for publicity. We have enough coverage to pass GNG. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:34, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.