Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chuck Pierce
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Nakon 02:03, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Chuck Pierce
- Chuck Pierce (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
While it's true that there are few biographical links to Chuck Pierce, there are (many) hundreds of interviews, conference appearances, books and the like. It's not quite accurate to call the sources that were added primary sources (although some certainly are). I would think that the references showing Pierce's appearances on Syd Roth's show, Patricia King's show and the many, many articles on Elijah list would be sufficient to show that he's sufficiently notable to merit an article. Waitak (talk) 23:38, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:16, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:16, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:16, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per lacking independent/significant sourcing. Fails GNG, ANYBIO or other suitable SNGs. Cavarrone 09:44, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
- Delete -- This reads as if the subject had a one-man ministry, who manages to get on to TV shows occasionally. Basically it reads like the bio of yet another NN minister of relgion. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:30, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.