Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clara Huhn

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to List of American supercentenarians#Clara_Huhn, insufficient reliable sources for anything more than a mention on a list. Davewild (talk) 20:40, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Clara Huhn

)

Stub article on a very old person, notability not established per

U.S. state longevity recordholders, which seems enough when there is so little to say about her; otherwise I suggest restoring the redirect to List of American supercentenarians#Clara_Huhn. -BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 11:51, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete: The interesting material about this woman seems already to be in other articles, and ther eseems no point in her having an article of her own. Anarchia (talk) 20:19, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Notability is evident and sourced. Article's stub status is not a reason to delete. Colonel Warden (talk) 00:24, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Reply. Sorry, but that's simply wrong.
  reliable sources to establish notability. The sources provided are entries in lists, and offer no substantial coverage. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 11:28, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Delete Just getting old does not satisfy
WP:N. Inclusion in a list is sufficient. Edison (talk) 17:39, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Merge as stub to List of American supercentenarians. Fromseatoshiningsea (talk) 00:16, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.