Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clare Richards
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was disambiguate. (non-admin closure) Esquivalience t 23:32, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
Clare Richards
- Clare Richards (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A non notable pseudonym of two different people that can't be used as a redirect either due to it being 2 people with no references to be found as well. See also the article of
Clare Richmond, there was another one like this that was AFD last month I believe. Wgolf (talk) 21:34, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
]
- Disambiguation page: Simply turn Clare Richards into a page that directs readers to either of the other articles. π♂101 (talk) 21:37, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
- Comment. I think a disambiguation page could work, possibly combining the different spellings of Clare/Claire into one list, with there also being Claire Richards to list. --Michig (talk) 07:27, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: if it was a pseudonym for one writer it would be a redirect. As it's a shared pseudonym, we need to link it to both writers. Whether or not it's technically a dab page, it needs to exist. WP:IAR if need be: the encyclopedia's readers are better helped by its existence. PamD 08:02, 25 May 2015 (UTC)]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:20, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:20, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
- Disambiguation page creation as per @Piguy101 and @Michig. Quis separabit? 21:04, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete No demonstation that this cooperative psedonym is notable enough for inclusion.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:37, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.