Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Classic Vacations (2nd nomination)
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -
Mailer Diablo 18:32, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]
Classic Vacations
AfDs for this article:
- Classic Vacations (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Article fails
WP:SPA account with no other edits other than related to Classic Vacations. Hu12 14:50, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply
]
- Delete as per nom. As notability is not inherited, being a subsidiary of Expedia does not give notability, and there is a lack of non-trivial, third-party sources which give this company notability. --Russavia 15:05, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete notability problems. -Icewedge 15:40, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete- Per nom. Tiptoety 19:00, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletions. -- Gavin Collins 15:45, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.