Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cleo Babbitt

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Nailed by Calton. Black Kite 00:54, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cleo Babbitt

Minor fictional character in a soap opera. Lacks real world information. Character appeared for only 2 months in a long running show. Fails notability and coverage of media. Magioladitis (talk) 19:53, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the
list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. —Magioladitis (talk) 19:56, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Redirect to List of As the World Turns characters. --neon white talk 21:57, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect redirect per neon white A dmrb♉ltz (t • c • log) 22:26, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or merge and redirect without deletion as it has enough coverage that I believe it can be salvaged in some context. Thus my policy based reasoning is
Tally-ho! 05:30, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply
]
WP:PROBLEM. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 17:39, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete. Minor fictional character without the slightest shred -- or hope of any, frankly -- real-world impact, notability, or even attention. --Calton | Talk 06:18, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Yup, I agree. Delete. Eusebeus (talk) 17:06, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: the character might have been discussed in Soap Opera Digest or some such magazine, and having print references would help a lot in establishing notability. Everyking (talk) 16:08, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- You seem to be correct. :) Best, --
  Tally-ho! 17:12, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Delete per Calton. Minor, non-notable, no coverage, etc. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 17:39, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: This character, which as has been pointed out is covered in various sources, is not
Tally-ho! 17:53, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply
]
Provide specific sources. Links to search engines with her name substituted are not acceptable. I will not respond to any comment that does not contain links to legitimate, reliable, independent sources which cover this character specifically and in depth that I can read right now. As you have tried to pass off non-reliable sources as reliable in the past, please review
WP:RSEX if necessary. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 18:12, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply
]
The specific sources are there by clicking on the search engine. As you have dismissed reliabel sources as non-reliable in the past, you may also want to review those pages. Sincerely, --
Tally-ho! 18:16, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply
]
[Gameshow "you lost" noise] No links to sources provided! Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 18:31, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
See the links above. Best, --
Tally-ho! 18:38, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.