Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clothing brand

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Drmies (talk) 02:12, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Clothing brand

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Dictionary definition of clothing brand, nothing more. Caffeyw (talk) 14:20, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Brainy J ~✿~ (talk) 16:46, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This article has no real content and no sources. As a second choice, redirect to brand. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 17:07, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per
WP:NOTDICT - Wikipedia is not a dictionary. →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 17:13, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete Right now it is just a dictionary definition. Even if a more informative article was written it would probably be better to give the information in some other article: Clothing, Modern clothing, Clothing manufacture, or something else more general. BayShrimp (talk) 20:42, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not a dictionary. Nwlaw63 (talk) 23:17, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:36, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to brand where the topic of product branding is discussed in greater sourced detail. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 08:03, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.