Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Club de Radioaficionados de Guatemala

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (X! · talk) · @961 · 22:04, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Club de Radioaficionados de Guatemala

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:ORG. 2 gnews hits for Spanish name including a Guatemalan newspaper and nothing in English [1]. LibStar (talk) 05:05, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Guatemala-related deletion discussions. —PanchoS (talk) 06:15, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. —PanchoS (talk) 06:15, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep As a national nonprofit organization that is its nation's representative in the
talk) 19:54, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

what? no evidence of significant third party coverage, therefore this meets

WP:AGF

does not apply to assuming there is coverage when none can be found. 02:52, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Let's also not forget

talk) 14:11, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This article has been nominated for rescue. PanchoS (talk) 15:27, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per the discussion and decision of the parent List's AFD... this article complies with the decision made. Going through the list and putting Each Article up for AFD is a waste of time and effort (as I notice several associations have pop'd up here lately). To delete the stubs would revert the List of amateur radio organizations back to a bunch of external links only, where it was agree'd that stubs were the better of the 2 options. Exit2DOS ^{• Ctrl • Alt • Del} 15:37, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I would ask you consider a MASS AFD rather than put them all up one by one, since you are using the same rational and I am using the same !keep argument. Exit2DOS ^{• Ctrl • Alt • Del} 15:37, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as at least minimal stub on national affiliate of notable international organization, all such affiliates should have a stub, it greatly simplifies the encyclopedia project. --
talk) 14:15, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: I have opened a discussion of this AfD and a dozen others open at this time for member societies at
talk) 00:25, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

Keep per above. Doc Quintana (talk) 15:46, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep As per previous comments, membership of IARU should be adequate for notability. Although a small country as far as amateur radio is concerned, it certainly deserves its own page in WP. Dsergeant (talk) 16:39, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.