Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colleen Wasinger
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 14:22, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
Colleen Wasinger
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Colleen Wasinger (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Biography of a county councillor, not
primary sources that are not support for notability at all (the county council's own website and her campaign website), with not even one reliable or notability-supporting piece of media coverage shown at all.
Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt her from having to have a lot more substance and sourcing than this. Bearcat (talk) 13:56, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
]
Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt her from having to have a lot more substance and sourcing than this. Bearcat (talk) 13:56, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 13:56, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 13:56, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
- Delete members of county councils are not default notable and the sourcing is not enough to show notability otherwise.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:08, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Searches on google news bring up lots of hits that could be added in, seems like this article could be improved rather than deleted. I've started. Here's great source if anyone wants to do more: https://news.stlpublicradio.org/tags/colleen-wasinger CT55555 (talk) 15:21, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
- Redirect to SPEAK 17:12, 28 March 2022 (UTC)]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 21:19, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 20:47, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Article should be improved rather than deleted. Possibly moved to draft. NiklausGerard (talk) 18:53, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
- Spartaz Humbug! 06:22, 12 April 2022 (UTC)]
- Delete does not pass WP:GNG either as all the coverage is specifically local. Local politicians are far from guaranteed a Wikipedia page. SportingFlyer T·C 13:01, 12 April 2022 (UTC)]
- Delete Being a council member does not qualify as being notable, and not other grounds for notability are obvious.Deathlibrarian (talk) 13:03, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.