Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Committee for the Abolition of Illegitimate Debt

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.

^(talk) ^(contribs) 07:46, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Committee for the Abolition of Illegitimate Debt

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Since creation in June 2005 this article has been unsourced. Though there are references to this organisation's work, I can't find any in-depth coverage in RS of the organisation itself. Fails

WP:ORG. Delete. Just Chilling (talk) 16:26, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 17:32, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 17:32, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I've updated the article. A few minutes of searching showed that CADTM's reports are found to be useful in the alterglobalisation movement press in the English language, and at least one of its reports was accepted as a submission by the OHCHR - effectively putting CADTM in the same group of organisations as the

WP:NGO I don't see any reason for deletion. Boud (talk) 02:03, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:22, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:17, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~SS49~ {talk} 06:29, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep sources look fine now. Mccapra (talk) 07:29, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.