Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Communist China and the Free World's Future
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 20:54, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
Communist China and the Free World's Future
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Communist China and the Free World's Future (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
On the basis of
talk) 10:11, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 10:36, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 10:36, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and per WP:NOTNEWS - there's no evidence that this speech has had any lasting impact. Nick-D (talk) 10:37, 28 September 2020 (UTC)]
- Delete per nom and per WP:NOTNEWS - to be notable, has to be a speech from someone like Trump himself, we don't create articles for cabinet member speeches. Albertaont (talk) 15:53, 28 September 2020 (UTC)]
- Comment - The speech is still not only from a notable member of the current U.S. cabinet (Secretary of State), it's still significant as part of the current relations between the Trump administration and China, and also useful for other readers to understand the current U.S. perspective (and especially the Trump administration) on China. If it is not possible to keep the article, then I suggest merging the article while trimming and leaving only relevant information where possible. Mr. Lechkar (talk) 22:27, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per above. ETTD. Pompeo has been shunned (even by Pope Francis) and is making virtually no effect on anything. I have seen no ongoing coverage; it was not even a front-page headline in a single news cycle. It's all screaming into the void of Trump's erratic and irrational foreign policy and blatant racism towards China and its people. At best, it deserves a redirect. I am not criticizing the content of his speech, but its impact, which is less than zero, a mote in the dustbin of history. Bearian (talk) 00:17, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.