Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of bones and teeth
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 11:04, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
- Comparison of bones and teeth (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article is poorly written and not a true comparison of bones and teeth. Major sections are essentially outlines of the qualities of teeth and of bones, which are already covered properly in their own articles. heather walls (talk) 05:27, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per ]
- Merge if there's anything that's not covered in either bone or teeth articles.--72.58.114.125 (talk) 03:46, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti Talk 19:11, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti Talk 19:11, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. North America1000 08:31, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
- delete WP:OR. Creator can try to add this to Wikiuniversity if they like Jytdog (talk) 17:50, 30 October 2016 (UTC)]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.