Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comprehensive Analysis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 07:39, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comprehensive Analysis

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable topic. Search returns many hits because the page title has a very general meaning, but no reliable sources covering the specific topic of the article. The references given also do not appear to be appropriate sources. Prod tag was removed; COI suspected. --Lambiam 18:00, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 20:24, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. We're here to help you Make Money Fast. But we aren't going to tell you how in the article, you have to pay for the seminar: The intention of comprehensive analysis is to resolve long-standing problems within the equities and derivative markets. Namely, it helps conservative and growth-oriented investors and traders continually generate income or cash flow in their portfolio every single month, while simultaneously reduce excessive risk, and potentially realize higher-than-average annual returns. It also helps traders and value investors identify optimal investment opportunities that exist within the markets every day, but are otherwise difficult, if not impossible, to identify manually, or, with single-theory approaches, such as fundamental, technical, or derivative analysis. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 20:33, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails
Stuartyeates (talk) 09:29, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete not notable, basically Advertising. Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:15, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.