Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Connecticut Coasters

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

Connecticut Coasters

Connecticut Coasters (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completely unsourced. Trivial and non-notable. Fails

• These all seem similar:
  • Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Orlando Jackals
  • Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Connecticut Coasters
  • Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Minnesota Arctic Blast
  • Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Los Angeles Blades
  • Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Empire State Cobras
  • Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Minnesota Blue Ox
  • Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/St. Louis Vipers
  • Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/San Diego Barracudas
  • Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Tampa Bay Tritons
  • Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Long Island Jawz
  • Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Las Vegas Flash
  • Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Pittsburgh Phantoms (RHI)
  • Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ottawa Wheels
  • Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Philadelphia Bulldogs
  • Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Montreal Roadrunners
  • Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Roller Hockey International

--doncram 17:38, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the

Lepricavark (talk) 18:17, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the

Lepricavark (talk) 18:40, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the

talk) 19:01, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

• Keep Professional major league team that was playing at the height of roller hockey popularity when it was on prime time ESPN which easily meets
  WP:SPORTCRIT is about players, not leagues or teams. -DJSasso (talk) 19:16, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• Speedy Keep This is getting ridiculous. Nominator should have done
  WP:SPORTCRIT only applies to players, and pages were not all created by a single user. Smartyllama (talk) 20:36, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep no evidence that nom made any effort to search for sources. Nominating with the same rationale for every AfD without (apparently) even checking to see if each article fits the rationale is a non-starter.
  Lepricavark (talk) 20:58, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep --doncram 17:38, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Keep. Blatant failure here of
  WP:BEFORE by nom. GauchoDude (talk) 18:18, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep Trackinfo (talk) 02:01, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Keep It took me a few minutes, but there were ample sources available about the team, including this lengthy article in
  WP:BEFORE, a fundamental obligation that must be met before moving forward with an AfD. Sadly, Zackmann08 has ignored all of the issues raised at these AfDs, refused to withdraw nominations where articles have been improved to add easily located sources and has simply moved on to destroy other encyclopedic content at XfD, without having learned any lessons from these previous failures to observe policy. Alansohn (talk) 15:29, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]