Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Connoisseur Selection
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
Spartaz Humbug! 06:54, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
]
Connoisseur Selection
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Connoisseur Selection (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No sources. Fails GNG. A few possible mentions on cigar forums, but certainly no significant coverage or reliable sources for this product line.
talk) 14:45, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the talk) 14:45, 4 June 2020 (UTC)]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the talk) 14:45, 4 June 2020 (UTC)]
- Delete - As author of this article, I vote for deletion. It is no longer relevant. Glacierman (talk) 15:25, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - I tried looking the brand up. But I found absolutely nothing. This is a non-notable and unpopular cigar brand that does not deserve it's own article. 🌴Koridas🌴 (Negotiate) 07:52, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.