Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Controversial issues surrounding Adipurush

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to Adipurush. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:44, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Controversial issues surrounding Adipurush

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Beyond unnecessary article.

See

WP:NOTNEWS. Aman Kumar Goel ^(Talk) 04:13, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete. This article as written violates
WP:TNT, but there's already a section in Adipurush, and that is where this topic should be covered until such time as a split is actually needed. A merge would not be appropriate given the NPOV issues. —siro χ o 08:28, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India. Shellwood (talk) 10:11, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Hinduism and Nepal. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:40, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merge, or delete if there's no content that can be added. This should not be split unless there's an explicit and good reason to do so that has not been provided, and even if all content is added from this article to Adipurush, the latter article won't get worryingly long or in need of splitting. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 04:27, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

keep as I can add much more information and I oppose this. Well the discussion here is actually opened by an editor who has history of edit wars. Irony. SuperHero ● 👊 ● ★ 18:07, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The addition of more information may not help much, or may even compound the issue. There seem to be all of

WP:RECENT do plague this article. —siro χ o 22:33, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Merge any notable subtopics to the main article. This article does not deserve its own page. aggarwala2727 (talk) 06:22, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Wikipedia isn’t a newspaper. Violation of

WP:NOTNEWS. Don’t Get Hope And Give Up — Preceding undated comment added 06:55, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Merge with Adipurush: A better alternative to deleting. Kailash29792 (talk) 11:32, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, if not, merge. I believe it is notable enough for its own page. Chamaemelum (talk) 11:35, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Adipurush.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 08:33, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merge relevant content needs to be combined with already existing page AdipurushAccesscrawl (talk) 15:34, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.