Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Convertigo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 10:45, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Convertigo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Software company advert based solely on press-releases. - üser:Altenmann

• Delete: After research I could find no sources suggesting this company meets
  WP:GNG. Safehaven86 (talk) 19:02, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• delete this is an advertisement for a non-notable company. --damiens.rf 13:52, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:57, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:57, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:57, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - This company has some coverage in french-language sources, for example:

• La plate-forme de mashup de Convertigo désormais Open Source (The mashup platform Convertigo now open source) by Antoine Crochet on 06/12/11 in Le Journal du Net (JDN). Crochet is a staff writer[1] covering information technology for JDN since 2001.

but not yet seeing enough to pass

WP:CORP. No prejudice against recreation if better sourcing, in any language, is found. -- 1Wiki8........................... (talk) 17:55, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

• Delete by all means as this information itself is advertising by literally going to specifics about what the company has to advertise about itself, the history noticeable suggests advertising intentions and actions since not only was the one authoring account an advertising-only account, the ones that followed were also, therefore it suggests this was only ever actually planned as an advertisement and that alone, no matter what someone thought was acceptable by sheerly listing "sources and information". SwisterTwister talk 20:18, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete nothing to discuss or debate about this one. Complete non-sense. Light2021 (talk) 10:29, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.