Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Corey Hallman

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. A Traintalk 19:45, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Corey Hallman

Corey Hallman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poorly referenced article about a lacrosse player of uncertain notability.

conflict of interest. Bearcat (talk) 01:29, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the ]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 13:15, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep, it's tenuous but there seem to be a handful of articles floating around, referenced or not (e.g.).- Simon Dodd {
    WP:LAW } 13:37, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply
    ]
One local newspaper article in his team's own local media market is not enough to get him over
WP:GNG. Bearcat (talk) 21:41, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply
]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 17:25, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete a total lack of the substantial coverage that is needed to pass GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:12, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Spartaz Humbug! 04:14, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply
]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ). No further edits should be made to this page.