Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Corfu Reading Society
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Draftify. Star Mississippi 18:57, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
Corfu Reading Society
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Corfu Reading Society (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Corfu Reading Society
This article does not establish
It acquired a social, educational, political and patriotic character, occupying an important role in the intellectual and social life of the Ionian area, as it was born through the liberal Western European perceptions of early 19th century and the emerging common European concept.
In the last section:
The Corfu Reading Society, during the last fifty years, has developed a remarkable publishing activity that focuses on the study and promotion of Ionian culture.
A Wikipedia article should describe what third-party
This page was moved from article space to draft space by one reviewer with the notation that it was not ready for article space. However, it was then moved back to article space by its author. Moving it back to draft space unilaterally a second time would be
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature, Organizations, and Greece. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:19, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
- Keep - don't see anything ]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:38, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
- Draftify: I do see some secondary source coverage online, but as it stands, it's just not ready for mainspace. I am worried, though; the author has gone back to their sandbox and reinstated the copyvio version of the page. Further action may be in order. Iseult Δx parlez moi 01:03, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
- Draftify the most elegant way forward, IMHO. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 09:17, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep, per Bearian's argument. ǁǁǁ ǁ Chalk19 (talk) 07:08, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
- I do not oppose a draftify in this situation. Bearian (talk) 13:03, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.