Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Counterwave Inc.

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 11:43, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Counterwave Inc.

Counterwave Inc. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable software company. No significant independent references, and Google search finds nothing of significance. I originally made the article into a redirect to Notakto, but the author restored it as an article. Looking further at the two wikilinked games, Notakto and Hackenbush, it turns out that they are generic games invented by other people, of which Counterwave markets a version. So I think Delete is the appropriate action. MelanieN (talk) 16:51, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·C) 19:44, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. North America1000 15:16, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete -- A7 material; no notability or significance. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:55, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete – Per source searches, does not meet
    WP:CORPDEPTH at this time. North America1000 15:03, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ). No further edits should be made to this page.