Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crazy Bus (video game)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:31, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Crazy Bus (video game)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't see this being a notable unlicensed video game other than its popularity after being covered by Angry Video Game Nerd and some listicles for worst video game music. 𝕒𝕥𝕠𝕞𝕚𝕔𝕕𝕣𝕒𝕘𝕠𝕟𝟙𝟛𝟞 🗨️ 🖊️ 19:03, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Venezuela. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:19, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Feels like it ought to be notable, but alas. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 20:36, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per
WP:GNG. One of the few prominent video games developed in Venezuela. --NoonIcarus (talk) 22:41, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
There are no sources that count towards notability in the article so please elaborate where the sources that prove it is "prominent" are. Otherwise this is a
WP:LOCALFAME argument. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 22:46, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

I don’t see this being prominent as a game developed in Venezuela, it was supposedly someone’s coding demo project that was compiled and packaged in a Sega Genesis cartridge. This would change if it was covered by a reliable source though. 𝕒𝕥𝕠𝕞𝕚𝕔𝕕𝕣𝕒𝕘𝕠𝕟𝟙𝟛𝟞 🗨️ 🖊️ 23:35, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This game doesn't seem notable at all; I am open to being proven wrong but I cannot see any viable sources in the article that count towards GNG. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 22:47, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: There's also a Nintendo Switch game with the same name, I don't see coverage of this game. The one RS per Source Highlighter (Source 5) is but a brief mention. I don't see coverage for this game we'd use for notability. Oaktree b (talk) 00:08, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Felt obligated to at least point to this source by GamesRadar+. It doesn't cover
WP:THREE but I thought I should mention this anyhow for documentation purposes. I did also see a Giant Bomb review for the game but I don't think it was made by one of the editorial staff, but I'll mention it anyways. Captain Galaxy 15:27, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
Can you link to the review? - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 21:29, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think it's this one. Skyshiftertalk 00:50, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Obvious user review Geschichte (talk) 09:17, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Although the article has a Giant Bomb review (as mentioned by CaptainGalaxy and sourced by Skyshifter), and a Game music of the day mention at GamesRadar+, The article does not seem to meet neither
WP:THREE. MKsLifeInANutshell (talk) 06:01, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.