Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cream Delight
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 10:21, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Cream Delight (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No assertion of significance. Should be speedy deleted. Barney the barney barney (talk) 21:47, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - It's not eligible for speedy deletion, but as far as I can tell, the lack of available sources providing in depth coverage means that the subject is not notable, except perhaps in some cookbooks. - MrX 22:27, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. - MrX 22:28, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. - MrX 22:28, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No attempt made to provide any evidence. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 23:32, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - not notable. ]
- Delete - Found mentions only in sources from Google books. Not finding any in-depth coverage. Northamerica1000(talk) 18:54, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete For the same reasons identified above.Kabirat (talk) 09:09, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.