Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Creation: The Physical Truth

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.

Creation: The Physical Truth

Creation: The Physical Truth (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Author removed both speedy and prod tags. Per the prod, "Non-notable per Wikipedia:Notability (books). Book is published by a non-notable publisher and no notable reviews recieved." See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harold Aspden. It holds that the author of the article and the author of the book are one in the same, as well. Not only would this be procedural, but I agree with the deletion. —Ryūlóng (竜龍) 07:57, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete the article does not assert notability of the subject, and there are no independant reviews cites. Tarinth 13:38, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I can't find any significant coverage of the book. Of the 13 non-wiki Google hits, most look self-generated. Nor, it seems, can the publisher find any coverage, as there's nothing about it on their page of Significant Media Coverage for Book Guild Authors. -- Fan-1967 13:49, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. As of this time, Wikipedia is not a book review service. linas 16:38, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Per the above. --Wildnox(talk) 22:09, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Fan-1967. -- Whpq 22:10, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete with prejudice as I am the initial lister. --ScienceApologist 22:19, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I'm fond of cranks and their books, but they have to be notable cranks and notable books to be on Wikipedia. — coelacan talk — 01:19, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per book notability criteria; see also
  tips) 03:50, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete per above.
  Yuser31415 19:44, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete per linas. --EMS | Talk 21:07, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per, well, everybody. Anville 22:18, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• delete -- I only make this apparently superfluous vote to mention that the article includes as a highlight of the work that it contains "algebraic equations and integral calculus" DGG 23:28, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.