Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Creede Fork

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

Creede Fork (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats

)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not seeing any real notability here. Slatersteven (talk) 15:53, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Its size makes it notable, and the article shows the fork has been mentioned in five separate sources. There are plenty of similar "largest" articles in Wikipedia.
  (talk) 22:36, 16 January 2018 (UTC).[reply
  ]

No what would make it notable is long term in depth coverage (I am not seeing that, I am seeing a lot of one paragraph mentions, or less), and other stuff is not a valid reason to keep.Slatersteven (talk) 15:59, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:55, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:55, 16 January 2018

• Keep This has been written about in Local, State and National publications both in print and online. It has been profiled by a publication every year since installation. Guinness Book of Records is currently reviewing. Please note that a much smaller Fork in Switzerland is profiled on Wikipedia... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fork_of_Vevey Ksiddel 3:34:02, 19 January 2018 (UTC). — Ksiddel (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Keep arguments must be based upon the article alone, not what other stuff we may have. And again, it is not being written about that matters it is being written about in depth over a very long period of time.Slatersteven (talk) 15:57, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge to Creede, Colorado per North America below. Great catch. Delete per nom. Despite the time period, no good sources are referenced. Blogs and Facebook really don't count. Ifnord (talk) 17:16, 24 January 2018 (UTC) Ifnord (talk) 19:25, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Selective Merge to
  WP:ATD-M. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:07, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Never thought of checking, so it is so notable it is not even on the towns own article. LOL!. Yep merge.Slatersteven (talk) 14:11, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge to article on the town of 290 people.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:33, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.