Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Criticism of Jesus as myth
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -
Mailer Diablo 15:10, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply
]
Criticism of Jesus as myth
- Criticism of Jesus as myth (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Unsourced OR POV fork: POV fork from Jesus as myth, unsourced OR, with an addition of a summary from a section of another article (Historicity of Jesus#Greco-Roman sources. New contributor acting like an old contributor has created this POV fork. Criticism belongs in the Jesus as Myth article, if appropriate. No merge indicated, as this is OR. KillerChihuahua?!? 14:39, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete. No need to split up original Jesus as Myth article - just needs shortening to accord with wikipedia guidelines (e.g. no OR, undue weight, etc.) Especially no need to create a POV fork. TheologyJohn 14:44, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - this is Deletion! 15:13, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as OR religious polemic. Edison 16:07, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete this is a classical POV fork. TSO1D 18:41, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and KC, you might want to wading through the Islamic article forks if you're into that sort of thing. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 20:54, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete POV fork, OR, prostletising, fundamental garbage. •Jim62sch• 21:25, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as textbook ]
- Delete it couldn't be more obvious that this is a fork. Put it in the article if there's concensus, if not it probably doesn't need to be on WP. Pastordavid 06:12, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete POV fork Agathoclea 10:43, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.